As
you have perhaps noticed, the Bishop’s address
has been divided into two parts – the first
part to be given tonight – and the second to
be delivered just before lunch tomorrow. Tonight I
will provide what I hope is a more comprehensive articulation
of the vision that I have put forth in the Voice and
on our web site; and tomorrow I will have a proposal
and an invitation – and a challenge, for how
we might concretely – and practically, live
into that vision. Tonight is about direction; tomorrow
is about managing the direction to what God has called
us.
In the 3rd
chapter of Exodus, a voice speaks to Moses from a
burning bush. God tells Moses to take off his shoes,
because Moses is standing on holy ground.
Indeed. It
is God’s holy ground. It always has been God’s
holy ground and always will be. But Moses and his
people had forgotten about holy ground. Slavery will
do that to you. All they could do was Pharaoh’s
bidding – and all they could hear was their
own groaning. They had no time for anything else.
But God heard
their groaning, and not only tells Moses that he is
standing on holy ground – but that God will
lead them to a new holy ground – where they
will flourish in freedom, and live in an abundant
land, flowing with milk and honey.
They are
to live into their new holy space – offering
their best to the blessing God has offered them. They
are to dwell in their new holy land, praising God
for freedom and love and guidance – and remembering
who and whose they are.
Almost a
year ago to the day, I had an unmistakable sense of
the presence of God in a ceremony that took my breath
away for its elegance and passion – and for
the many voices praising the Holy Spirit who had brought
us together in a new journey on this holy ground.
It was not the burning bush; it was the September
2006 electing convention that invited me -- to the
holy land of New Jersey. It is a land flowing with
a people who continually and creatively build on their
long-standing commitment to justice; it is a diocese
where people are gaining confidence in claiming their
desire to be in a deeper, more abiding relationship
with God; it is a collection of congregations where
diversity is a gift to be discovered, celebrated –
and rediscovered and sorted through and re-celebrated
– again and again and again. It is a unique
piece of God’s real estate where the rivers
may flow, but the traffic does not. It is a state
teeming with Yankee fans – and now, unexpectedly,
Giants fans; a diocese confounded with budget concerns
and strategy confusion. The diocese of Newark is a
holy land flowing with committed and talented priests,
deacons and laypeople. Those of us who have been away
for awhile – and have returned, know –
perhaps at a deeper level than the rest of you who
have always been here, how lovely you are.
It is an
incredible privilege to be among you – to re-claim
the holiness that has always been here, and together
to discover new sacred acres and opportunities. Through
your invitation and God’s grace, I am now to
live into this new space – to fill this space
– offering my best to the blessing of what God
has offered me.
That is what
I am meant to do. That is what Moses was meant to
do. That is what all of us are called to do –
to claim the holy ground on which we live and move
and have our being – and offer our best to God
and God’s creation. When we can claim our ground
as holy – and praise the God who has given us
this extraordinary gift – as holy; and when
we see all our brothers and sisters (not just some,
but all) and the ground they walk on– as holy,
holiness and wholeness increase exponentially.
There are
many ways to claim this holy ground. Here, in this
diocese, we are beginning to live into a new vision
– standing with the living Christ at the gates
of hope. In the past several months, as I have pondered
and prayed over this image, I have this deepening
sense that the gates invite and guide people onto
holy ground. And the core values that have emerged
in my visits and conversations over the past year
– worship, spiritual formation, justice/nonviolence
– and radical hospitality, represent the foundational
gates through which we – as congregations, individuals
– and as a diocese, have been finding –
and are finding, and will be finding – ways
to new holy ground.
The gate
of hope through which Moses and his people walked
was the Sinai wilderness. After forty years of getting
geographically lost and spiritually disoriented, they
descended into their new holy land with a new hope
and a fledgling freedom. They had no end of excitement
as they prepared to set up housekeeping in the Promised
Land, and there was no end of resentment from the
people who were already there. The only welcome the
Jewish people received was from God. Almost immediately,
the gift of holy ground evolved into a struggle over
turf. At first the struggle was with the Canaanites,
Hittites, Amorites, Perizzites, Hivites and the Jebusites
– but over the centuries the turf war involved
the Muslims, the Crusaders, the British – and
now the Palestinians – who have genealogical
connections with the original residents.
Holy ground
– as God bequeathed it to Moses, got lost in
the clamor over turf. It has been ever thus. The turf
wars have wildly different manifestations. In the
promised land of today, a thirty foot high wall has
gone up separating the Jewish state from Palestinian
neighbors. Those who have built the fence identify
it as a necessary security fence; while those on the
other side see it as an arrogant act of provocation
– because when people see it they receive a
very clear message – ‘this side is mine
– and that side may be yours.’ In American
cities, invisible fences separating turf are patrolled
with deadly intent by street gangs. Across the country,
anxiety over American turf has created draconian immigration
policies that separate families and denigrates human
dignity. Taking a cue from the Mideast experience,
Congress has authorized the construction of a fence
that separates Arizona from Mexico – challenging
the poet Robert Frost’s wisdom that ‘good
fences make good neighbors.’
It would
be a bit comforting to think that our communities
of faith would be spared from turf wars, but they
aren’t. Most of us have people in our congregations
who insist that the pew they sit in each week has
been given to them by divine decree. As a Rector,
I learned long ago that there were certain areas of
church life that I ventured into at my peril. It could
be the roof or the boiler – or parts of the
sacristy – or a room of the Sunday School –
or an area of the budget, which was the special fiefdom
of a lay leader who had long ago carved out that territory
as their own. I discovered that I needed permission
to enter into these privileged provinces – and
in some cases I was required to show an ecclesiastical
passport with accompanying Vestry issued visa. Woe
would befall me if I didn’t have one.
Not that
I didn’t have my own protected provinces. During
my years as a priest, I was reluctant, if not resistant
– and some might say downright grumpy about
the prospect of someone else singing the Exsultet
at the Easter Vigil. As bishop, I have a whole new
arena of canonical responsibilities – that are
vast and complex, and I will try and honor them as
responsibilities and not allow them to become territory
that I look over with an imperial air – but
temptation will no doubt tug at me, as it does with
all of us. I invite us all to hold one another accountable
– graciously.
It would
be bad enough if issues of turf were confined to geography.
And of course they aren’t. The Anglican Communion
is in the midst of an ideological turf war. There
is an emboldened and brazen group of Episcopalians
and Anglicans, who are – to my mind saying,
‘this is my Gospel. You have misread it and
misinterpreted it and misapplied it – and we
are going to take it back for ourselves; it is ours
– and we will no longer share holy ground with
you.’ And these same passionate people are saying
that they have carved out a corner on human sexuality
– and instead of sexuality being a holy gift
from God that can – and should, reflect the
diversity of the human family, it is reduced to behavioral
turf.
The temptation
is to issue counterpoints to the incendiary sound
bites coming at us. But -- as a good friend of mine
told me recently, it is tempting – and may,
in the short run, be more satisfying, to make a point.
But the biblical challenge is to make a difference.
Making a difference takes longer than making a point
– but the result is more abiding and transforming.
Our vision
is to stand with the living Christ at the gates of
hope. Our challenge is to claim God’s holy ground.
Through God’s grace and our witness –
we can – and we must, find ways of sharing holy
ground with the Canaanites (both the ancient –
and now more recent iteration) and the Hittities,
Amorites, Perizzites, Hivites and Jebusites –
and whoever else is out there who makes the claim
that this is primarily about turf. Sharing holy ground
is how we will make a difference.
We also make
a difference by claiming God’s holy ground,
and by providing invitation and welcome to the gates
through which we get to that holy ground – and
the divine hope that is abundant there. Are the gates
high or low, narrow or wide; should the gates ever
be closed – and for what reason? The presence
of the gates – be they images in our prayer
or tangible renderings as we have them around this
room, remind us that there is, in fact, holy ground;
and it is on God’s holy ground where we are
meant to live -- with each other.
The congregations
of the diocese are gates of hope for the communities
where they have been planted. As gates, they need
definition and dimension. What is the community the
congregation is called to serve? Is it the immediate
neighborhood? Does it extend to the next town –
and/or to the nearest jail or shelter or immigration/deportation
center; does it include the next county – and
does it embrace Newark or Paterson or Jersey City
– or the rural challenges of Warren and Sussex
Counties; and how might it consider Cameroon or Kothapallamita,
India or Panama or Haiti? What is your mission field?
How are you going to determine it? When I was in Worcester,
Massachusetts, it took a group of us two solid years
to mark the boundary of our urban neighborhood –
which became our parish, which became our mission
field. It was hard, but rewarding work. We walked
the streets. We prayed a lot. We made a lot of mistakes.
We drew on the wisdom of the Gospel of Mark, and of
each other.
Instead of
sinking into the mire of the latest turf war, we would
do well to seek clarity and develop discipline in
defining our gates. In my visits to congregations
I have discovered that – much like Americans
and the British are separated by a common language,
we in the Episcopal Church are separated by a book
of Common Prayer. There is wide diversity in how the
liturgy is celebrated from one congregation to another.
I see this as a good thing. Actually, it is a wonderful
characteristic of this diocese. I also see that worship
is the foundational and most important gate of hope
that we have – because worship leads people
into a deeper appreciation that we live on God’s
holy ground. Worship invites us – through word
and sacrament, into the mystery of God’s abundance
and blessing. Worship reaffirms and reinforces the
outrageous claim that we are all brothers and sisters
in the divine family. So we need to be clear about
the worship gate – which means there needs to
be choreography for the liturgy, an intention for
how we might identify and celebrate seasons and saints’
days, national and local crises and community opportunities.
We need to engage creative discipline in the use of
the prayer book and music and space and language so
that it can become a more solid floor upon which our
souls can more freely dance. Without an adequate gate,
confusion follows – especially those who are
coming through the worship gate for the first time
– and then holiness is compromised.
The same
discipline and clarity need to be applied to the gates
of spiritual formation, justice/nonviolence and radical
hospitality. We would do well to draw from the wisdom
of the business community and be SMART about this
– smart being an acronym for specific, measurable,
achievable, realistic and timetable. Many of the people
in most of the congregations I have been to say –
with pride, that theirs is a warm and friendly congregation.
This is a good thing. But warmth and friendliness
are the gifts that are released when people stand
together on holy ground; but they are not, in and
of themselves, gates of hope. Every congregation says
they are warm and friendly – whether it is true
or not. The challenge is to provide a carefully articulated
gate of hospitality through which people can enter
into the warmth and fellowship of what it means to
be the body of Christ. And saying that you need more
money and people communicates a lot of anxiety –
but very little in terms of a plan – or a welcome.
The same
definition and dimension needs to be applied to the
gates of hope for the diocese. We need to get clearer
and more disciplined in our strategy for the future.
There is a lot of anxiety about the future of congregations
– and how the diocese might step in –
or should step in, and either assist or force the
closing of congregations. We need protocols and a
plan for the 112 gates of hope across the diocese.
When these gates are not adequately defined –
and there is not an adequate strategy or plan on the
horizon, anxiety becomes the prevailing attitude,
issues of turf take over -- and hope ends up being
little more than a four letter word. I have heard
talk – in various quarters of the diocese, of
consolidating congregations, which for some is a code
word for closing churches. On one level, the consolidation
approach seems – for some, to make the most
sense in our urban centers – where the economic
challenges are the most acute. Fifty years ago, there
were 17 Episcopal churches in the city of Newark;
today there are five. Fifty years ago, there were
12 Episcopal churches in Jersey City; today there
are three. Fifty years ago – Paterson had five
churches; there are now two. I suppose an argument
could be made that our three largest diocesan cities
were overchurched fifty years ago – but I wouldn’t
make that case now. We have had enough church consolidation
in our cities. Our cities are where human groaning
is most easily heard, human degradation is most easily
seen – and the incidence of violence and fear
is hardest to avoid. Instead of dismantling gates
of hope, we need to reinforce – if not re-define,
the gates we have now – and consider building
more. And we need to be creative and clever –
if not cunning, in doing so.
So -- the
challenge is to claim God’s holy ground and
live into God’s holy hope. The work is to define
the gates through which people travel to holy ground.
And the invitation for us who stand with the living
Christ at the gates of hope – is to develop
a message as we show and invite and guide people in
and through the gates.
We need to
find our voice.
When I was
a sophomore in college, a small group of us organized
an Easter sunrise service for the college community.
The college community considered itself a citadel
of secularism, which in 1971 was the common mindset
in New England, so our idea of a worship service was
a somewhat radical one. We got permission to hold
it on the edge of the bird sanctuary. The artist among
us created a spiffy poster, which we proceeded to
put up all over campus. We talked a bit about liturgy,
but not much. Some of us were Episcopalian, others
were not – and the rest weren’t sure what
they were. We were committed to the idea, but were
otherwise totally lacking in any spiritual confidence
A half hour
before sunrise we began to assemble. Our design team
– which is a loftier term than it deserved,
got there first. And we figured we would be it. And
then people started coming – quietly and reverently,
taking their seats among the pricker bushes and fallen
leaves. We figured that about one hundred people showed
up, a sizeable number in a student body of just over
a thousand. There was a sense of awe as the sun came
up – and almost immediately disappeared behind
a cloud. So did the collective energy. We weren’t
really sure what to do next. One of our bolder members
broke the awkward silence by saying, ‘I am going
to read something from the Bible – and you can
take it to mean whatever you want it to mean.’
He read the Easter story from the Gospel of Luke.
Shortly after that, someone passed around some wine
– with the same introduction – ‘you
can take this to mean whatever you want it to mean.’
Finally, I led the singing of “Jesus Christ
is Risen today” – and, so as not to offend
anyone – or be considered a religious zealot,
we sang it as a folk song rather than a glorious hymn
of praise and faith.
It was our
faith – no matter how tentative or confused,
that led us to propose the worship service –
but when people gathered, we essentially apologized
for that faith, and the church which represents that
faith. We didn’t have a voice – because
we weren’t clear about what we wanted to communicate;
and we were afraid that any voice we used might be
misunderstood or seem offensive – or overly
doctrinaire. I suspect most of us left that celebration
at sunrise amazed that so many college students had
a spiritual desire that was deep enough to get them
out of bed before dawn on a Sunday morning. And I
suspect that most of us were disappointed that their
desire was responded to so timidly.
I have learned
a lot in intervening 37 years. I have learned about
the genius of the Anglican tradition – that
our worship gate of word and sacrament, of sacred
story and spiritual practice, of justice and nonviolence
– and of welcome and hospitality – don’t
invite people into theology and doctrine, but into
mystery. It is the mystery of our being brought together
through and by the living Christ. We live into a new
way of thinking, rather than think our way into a
new way of living. It is the mystery of transformation
– of ourselves and of the world.
This mystery,
this transformation – needs our voice. We need
to learn to stand at the gates – not like a
college sophomore afraid of his own faith, but as
disciples who know the height and depth and breadth
of the gate – who are insistent that those who
have been pushed away because of prejudice or ignorance
or fear, are given equal access. We need to know the
gates, and embrace the promise of abundance and freedom
on the holy ground on the other side. We need to talk
about this hope. We need to pray with this hope. We
need to sing of this hope – and dance in it.
It is powerful, life changing, earth shaking hope.
There is nothing timid about it.
Let us stand
at the gates, let us claim our God given and Spirit
guided voice – and issue the invitation –
“Come on through. Offer your best to the blessing
that God so desperately wants to offer you. Come on
in; take off your shoes -- and together let us discover
what it means to stand on holy ground.”
+Mark Beckwith
|